ADMINS
Kenton Ngo
Johnny Camacho
Aimee Fausser
EDITORS
Bryan Scrafford
Adam Sharp
DanielK

BlogRoll
STATEWIDE
Bearing Drift
Blue Commonwealth
BlogNetNews
CobaltVA
Not Larry Sabato
Raising Moran
VAPoliticalBlogs

NORTHERN
7 West
Albo Must Go
Anonymous Is A Woman
Anti-BVBL
Blacknell
Blueweeds
Getting Around
Leslie Byrne
Left of the Hill
Ox Road South
Raw Fisher
Renaissance Ruminations
The Green Miles
Too Conservative
X Curmudgeon

HAMPTON ROADS
Shad Plank
VBDems
Vivian Paige

CHARLOTTESVILLE
Democratic Central
Rick Sincere
Rule .303
Shaun Kenney
Waldo Jaquith

RICHMOND
SlantBlog
Save Richmond
Tertium Quids

SOUTHSIDE
Dem Bones
What IS Right For Virginia
220 South

VALLEY
Adam Sharp
RockDem
The Friendly City
The Valley Progress Report

SOUTHWEST
Rick Howell Speaks
Star City Harbinger

Why PPP's latest poll is just not good

by: Bharat

Tue Jul 07, 2009 at 04:03:14 PM EDT


( - promoted by Aimee Fausser)

I was pretty pleased that McDonnell hadn't broken 50% yet and that Deeds was in the mid 40s, but looking at the crosstabs of the poll I find that Deeds is probably actually leading at this point.

Overall:
McDonnell - 49%
Deeds - 43%

Looking at the crosstabs, though, there seem to be some pretty significant errors...

Bharat :: Why PPP's latest poll is just not good
3 big errors pop out at me while giving this a cursory glance:

1. They sample 33% Rs and 34% Ds...in reality, Ds have about a 7 point advantage, so Ds have been undersampled while Rs have been oversampled

2. They sample 24% of voters from the 703 area code (northern VA), but 23% from the 540 (Roanoke and other small, rural areas)...NoVa has been tragically undersampled while the 540 has been oversampled

3. Finally, deeds is only leading women 45-44...this just can't be true, especially since his favorability ratings among women are MUCH better than McDonnell's.

I normally love PPP, but it seems like they are very much off the mark this time.

Full poll results available here: http://www.publicpolicypolling...

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
careful... this is mostly a sample size issue
h/t Blue Virginia

Sample size for rational sub-groups is often a challenge ... when n=600... when when looking at cross-tabs... Margin of Error (MOE) can be quite large in small sample sizes. RE: AA's, women, Hispanic, etc. Overall MOE = +/- 4%.

Quoting from Blue Virginia

UPDATE: Tom Jensen of PPP emailed me to say, "The Hispanic numbers are based on something like 12 interviews so that's why they seem erratic...I'm sure McDonnell isn't really going to win the Hispanic vote but when you have a sample size of around 600 for the overall poll and then a crosstab for a small voting bloc there's high potential for that number to be skewed."

Still the basic finding is correct -- this is a close race at this very early data point -- the true effect of intense campaign activity is yet to be measured.


Some corrections to Bharat......
I think Bharat's general point is valid that the sample skews more Republican than the actual electorate will be, but Bharat exaggerates the extent of it.  It's dubious to predict a 7-point Democratic turnout margin over the GOP, as it wasn't quite that big in Virginia last year and it will be less this year with minorities making a smaller share of the total vote.  People of color were 30% of last year's voters, but only 22% of 2006 Senate voters, and this fall's electorate will be closer to 2006 than 2008 (there are no exit polls for odd-year Virginia state races, so federal races have to be used as approximations).  All that said, I do think Democrats will have more than just the one-point advantage in the PPP poll, and independents won't be one-third of the total--they're never that much in Virginia, they're always in the mid-to-high 20s.

Regarding the female and Hispanic vote, the small subsamples do, indeed, explain it.

Ultimately one thing I look for in crosstabs is the Democrat's share of the white vote.  If the Democrat gets 40% or close to it at this stage, then we're in good shape, because 40% is the magic number to eek out victory.


Some corrections to Bharat......
I think Bharat's general point is valid that the sample skews more Republican than the actual electorate will be, but Bharat exaggerates the extent of it.  It's dubious to predict a 7-point Democratic turnout margin over the GOP, as it wasn't quite that big in Virginia last year and it will be less this year with minorities making a smaller share of the total vote.  People of color were 30% of last year's voters, but only 22% of 2006 Senate voters, and this fall's electorate will be closer to 2006 than 2008 (there are no exit polls for odd-year Virginia state races, so federal races have to be used as approximations).  All that said, I do think Democrats will have more than just the one-point advantage in the PPP poll, and independents won't be one-third of the total--they're never that much in Virginia, they're always in the mid-to-high 20s.

Regarding the female and Hispanic vote, the small subsamples do, indeed, explain it.

Ultimately one thing I look for in crosstabs is the Democrat's share of the white vote.  If the Democrat gets 40% or close to it at this stage, then we're in good shape, because 40% is the magic number to eek out victory.


Recent Diaries

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Syndicate
RSS 2.0
Tip Jar

EMAIL
Send tips & press releases to:
[email protected]

Search




Advanced Search


LeftyBlogs Latest

The views expressed on this site are representative solely of the author, and do not necessarily imply endorsement by New Dominion Project staff.
Powered by: SoapBlox